Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 100: 108145, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1401544

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) on the severity and mortality of COVID-19 remains largely unknown. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the prevalence of ILD among patients with COVID-19 and figure out the relationship between ILD and the poor clinical outcomes of COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and MedRxiv Database from 1 January 2020 to 26 May 2021. RESULTS: 15 studies with 135,263 COVID-19 patients were included for analysis of ILD prevalence. The pooled prevalence of comorbid ILD in patients with COVID-19 was 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.8%, I2 = 91%) with significant between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, the prevalence of ILD in non-survival patients with COVID-19 was 2.728-folds higher than that in corresponding survival patients (RR = 2.728, 95% CI 1.162-6.408, I2 = 54%, p = 0.021). Additionally, 2-3 studies were included for comparison analysis of clinical outcome between COVID-19 patients with and without ILD. The results showed that the mortality of COVID-19 patients with ILD was remarkably elevated compared with patients without ILD (RR = 2.454, 95% CI 1.111-5.421, I2 = 87%, p = 0.026). Meanwhile, the pooled RR of ICU admission for ILD vs. non-ILD cases with COVID-19 was 3.064 (95% CI 1.889-4.972, I2 = 0, p < 0.0001). No significant difference in utilizing rate of mechanical ventilation was observed between COVID-19 patients with and without ILD. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in ILD prevalence among patients with COVID-19 across the globe. Pre-existing ILD is associated with higher severity and mortality of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Heliyon ; 7(4): e06813, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1188589

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the respiratory supports and determine their association with clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv and BioRxiv database from December 2019 to 2 July 2020. Studies reporting the application of respiratory supports in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU were included. RESULTS: Forty studies with 15320 COVID-19 patients were included in this systematic review. The proportion of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) application in ICU patients with COVID-19 was 73.8%. Further analysis elucidated that the use rate of IMV in Asia, Europe and North America was 47%, 76.2% and 80.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with prone positioning and IMV was 29.4%. 25.5% of COVID-19 patients requiring IMV developed ventilator-associated pneumonia. The mortality of patients treated with IMV was 51.1%, while only 17.5% of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with non-IMV respiratory support died. Additionally, the utilization rate of IMV in non-survival patients was shown 17.26-folds (95%CI 2.89-103.24, p = 0.002) higher than that in survival patients, while the use rate of ECMO was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU in different continents. IMV is a life-saving strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients with ARDS, yet the mortality remains very high.

3.
Chinese Journal of Immunology ; 36(19):2309-2311, 2020.
Artículo en Chino | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1029628

RESUMEN

Objective: New coronavirus pneumonia epidemic, a sudden public health incident, not only tested medical education in China, but also injected impetus into ideological and political reform of medical curriculum. Clinical Immunology is a bridge course between basic medicine and clinical diseases, and it is also a course with rapid development and rich in "ideological and political elements". This article will fully excavate ideological and political elements in new coronavirus pneumonia epidemic, and explore how to effectively integrate these ideological and political elements into teaching of Clinical Immunology to improve comprehensive quality of students.

4.
Med Hypotheses ; 144: 110161, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-694471

RESUMEN

Immune dysregulation characterized by T cell exhaustion and high level of inflammatory cytokines is associated with severe COVID-19. Figuring out the early event of immune dysregulation would provide a potential treatment for COVID-19. Recent evidence indicate that mitochondrial dysfunction participates in the development of COVID-19 and may be responsible for the dysregulated immune response. Mitochondrial-targeted ubiquinone (MitoQ), a mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant, shows beneficial effects on various diseases through improving mitochondrial dysfunction. We hypothesize that MitoQ could act as a potential treatment in COVID-19. MitoQ may alleviate cytokine storm and restore the function of exhausted T cells in COVID-19 patients through improving mitochondrial dysfunction. In this article, we provide evidence to support the use of MitoQ as a potential treatment or adjunct therapy in the context of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos Organofosforados/uso terapéutico , Ubiquinona/análogos & derivados , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Sistema Inmunológico , Modelos Teóricos , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ubiquinona/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA